🎉 Limited Time Offer: Get 10% OFF on Your First Order!
Industry Trends

Why I'm Careful Recommending Bemis for Every Food Packaging Job

The Short Version: I Used to Think Bemis Was the Universal Answer

I'll say it upfront: for healthcare packaging, medical device components, and high-barrier food applications, Bemis (now part of Amcor) is hard to beat. But if you're a mid-size food manufacturer looking for standard stand-up pouches for dry goods, it might be overkill—and I've got the invoice to prove why.

I handle procurement for a regional food brand. We do about $4M annually in flexible packaging spend. For the first two years in this role (starting 2021), I defaulted to Bemis for nearly everything. The logic seemed sound: strong brand, global network (Amcor acquisition, 2019), excellent customer service.

Looking back, I should have spent more time qualifying the real needs for each SKU. At the time, I was new, and "Bemis" felt like a safe choice. It wasn't always.

Argument 1: The Barrier Film Was Genuinely Excellent—But We Didn't Need It

In September 2022, I ordered 15,000 pre-made pouches for a nut blend line. The product required moderate oxygen barrier—nothing extreme, the shelf life target was 9 months. I specified a standard metalized film with an EVOH layer because that's what Bemis's technical team recommended after a quick call.

The cost: $0.38 per pouch, including setup fees. Total: $5,700.

A local converter quoted me $0.27 per pouch for a simpler metalized PET/PE structure with an OTR of ~1.0 cc/100 in²/day. That's about the same performance for most dry roasted nuts. The difference? About $1,650—and a lead time that was two weeks shorter.

The Bemis pouches performed perfectly. No complaints. But we didn't need EVOH for that SKU. I paid a premium for a spec that was designed for a different problem (high-fat, long-shelf-life, sensitive products).

In my opinion, the Bemis advantage in barrier technology is real—but it only matters when you're pushing shelf life past 12 months or dealing with highly sensitive products (like coffee with volatile oils, or medical devices requiring sterile barrier). For standard dry goods under a year? You're probably over-specifying.

Argument 2: The Product Catalog Is Massive—Which Creates Selection Risk

One of my biggest regrets: ordering 8,000 units of a specific Bemis structure without double-checking the product data sheet's fine print. The part number looked right. The description matched. What I missed: the sealant layer was designed for form-fill-seal machines, not pre-made pouch converting.

The mistake affected roughly $3,200 worth of material. We caught it during incoming inspection—the seals were weak, peel strength was about 40% below spec. The pouches couldn't hold the nitrogen flush we needed. The vendor accepted return, but I ate the $890 in return freight plus the production delay: one week while we rush-ordered replacements.

If I could redo that decision, I'd invest in better upfront communication with Bemis's application engineers. Not just a quick check—a full spec review with the actual converting partner on the line. But given what I knew then (nothing about seal layer compatibility), my mistake was understandable. Avoidable? Yes. Understandable? Also yes.

Since then, we've created a pre-order checklist that includes confirming sealant chemistry with the converter before placing any custom film order. We've caught 47 potential mismatches using this checklist in the past 18 months.

Argument 3: The "Amcor Global Network" Benefit Is Real—Until It Isn't

After the acquisition, Bemis customers were told they'd get access to Amcor's global sourcing, R&D, and manufacturing footprint. That's a powerful pitch—and it's largely true for large-scale, multi-site contracts.

But for a mid-size buyer like us, the reality was different. The local sales rep changed three times in two years. Each handoff meant re-explaining our requirements, reconfirming lead times, and restarting trust-building. The global R&D resources sounded great on paper, but we never actually accessed them for our modest volume (about 2 million pouches annually across all SKUs).

Plus, the product range from Bemis's legacy portfolio is still partially separate from Amcor's. If you're buying a Bemis-specific structure (say, a co-extruded film for medical packaging), it might not be available through Amcor's standard catalog. That fragmentation caused a two-week delay on a reorder in Q3 2024—the film wasn't stocked in the distribution center that handles Amcor orders. Totally avoidable if we'd known the supply chain setup.

What About the Critics?

I can already hear the objection: "But Bemis's quality is consistently high. You never get bad seals or gauge variation. That's worth the premium."

Fair point. I agree that for medical device packaging—where a seal failure means a sterility breach—Bemis is probably the right call even at a premium. The consistency matters when failure costs lives, not just lost product.

But for food packaging, the risk tolerance is different. A seal failure in a bag of granola means a customer complaint and maybe a $5 refund. Not great, but not a recall-and-lawsuit situation. The premium for Bemis-level consistency might not pencil out when you can buy 80% of the reliability from a competent regional converter for 25% less.

Another pushback: "You should have done your homework before ordering." True. I did, but I was too trusting of the brand name. The lesson wasn't that Bemis is bad—it's that every supplier has a sweet spot. For Bemis, it's high-barrier, long-shelf-life, sensitive products (medical, pharma, high-fat foods, coffee) and applications where failure is expensive. For standard dry goods with moderate barrier needs, the cost structure doesn't favor them—and you're paying for capability you won't use.

Bottom Line

I recommend Bemis for: healthcare packaging (sharps containers, medical device pouches, sterile barrier films), high-barrier food packaging (coffee, nuts with high oil content, products with >12 month shelf life), and applications where failure risk justifies a premium. But if you're buying standard stand-up pouches for granola, snacks, or dry pet food, you can get comparable performance from a good regional converter for significantly less.

The honest truth: I wasted about $5,000 learning this lesson across three orders in 2022-2023. If you're in a similar position—mid-size buyer, decent volume but not massive—do the math before defaulting to Bemis. The brand is excellent. The question is whether your product needs what they're excellent at.

$blog.author.name

Jane Smith

Sustainable Packaging Material Science Supply Chain

I’m Jane Smith, a senior content writer with over 15 years of experience in the packaging and printing industry. I specialize in writing about the latest trends, technologies, and best practices in packaging design, sustainability, and printing techniques. My goal is to help businesses understand complex printing processes and design solutions that enhance both product packaging and brand visibility.

Ready to Make Your Packaging More Sustainable?

Our team can help you transition to eco-friendly packaging solutions